Friday, October 07, 2005

THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY

Welcome to Charge: the future of energy

A HYDROGEN ECONOMY BASED ENTIRELY ON RENEWABLES
by Daniel C. Sweeney, Ph.D

I am currently involved in preparing a market study on hydrogen—one which focuses primarily on present industrial uses rather than anticipated uses in fuel cell powered cars or fuel cell based distributed electrical generation. There is, however, a segment devoted to energy, and, in preparing that segment, I have been compelled to come to grips with the vision of a hydrogen economy based entirely upon renewable energy and to arrive at some estimate of its feasibility.

Remarkably, no one seems to have performed any detailed analysis in this area. Legions of Greens assume that such a transition is not only a foregone conclusion but that no obstacles stand in the way of its accomplishment other than the greed of large corporations with a stake in the existing energy regime.

But are these assumptions in fact true?

Perhaps the best means of arriving at an answer is to examine the renewable options and to determine what renewable energy resources could be effectively exploited on such a scale as to supplant the current fossil fuel regime.

Renewable energy sources include wind; solar energy; hydroelectric power; ocean power, which in some sense is a subcategory of hydroelectric; geothermal; and biomass. Of this group only wind appears highly promising for truly large scale energy generation in the United States. Solar energy is fine for providing off-grid electrical power to residences and small businesses but is currently far too expensive for utility scale electrical generation, though that may change in the future. The others are either dark horses or not in the running at all. Hydroelectric is limited to certain favorable locales as is geothermal. Ocean power, whether we’re discussing wave or tidal generators or those based on temperature differentials, is largely unproven, while biomass requires such large amounts of land that is unlikely ever to serve as anything more than a supplementary energy source.

So let’s examine wind in further detail while putting the others aside for the moment.

Hydrogen economy prophets like to cite Department of Energy statistics on total wind resources for the U.S. continental land mass, resources that are so plentiful that but a tiny fraction of them would meet our energy needs in full now and for the foreseeable future. They also like to cite various studies that indicate that wind power is now fully cost competitive with fossil fuel generated electricity. Both assertions are essentially true, but they must be considered in the light of certain evidence, that while not directly contradictory, yet calls the case for a easy renewable transition into question.

First the matter of the size and scope of the wind resources.

Wind resources are huge, no doubt about it. Unfortunately they not necessarily easily exploited. Most utility scale turbines require at least an 8 knot breeze in order to operate and thus are limited to areas with strong prevailing winds such as mountain passes, coastal areas or the Great Plains. Lower speed designs exist but they generally trade off efficiency and cost effectiveness. And because the most favorable wind resources are most commonly found in remote areas, expanding the scope of wind generation generally requires a lot of new transmission capacity which is expensive to build and will consequently tend to make wind power uncompetitive with fossil fuel plants. Moreover, wind power, if implemented on a grand scale, would require a fundamentally different kind of electrical grid than we have today.

The key problem here is delivering a steady 110 or 220 volts to residences and businesses with a wildly fluctuating power source. When wind is merely a supplementary source, as it is everywhere today, then the fossil fuel core electrical generation system can provide the steady base line power. But if that’s not the case, then we have a problem.

The solution would be to build significant overcapacity in the wind generation facilities and utilize that overcapacity to create a reserve of stored energy. Most hydrogen advocates see hydrogen functioning as an energy carrier and the hydrogen itself being generated by electrolysis.

The question is how much overcapacity would be required, and that in turn raises the questions of how the hydrogen will be utilized in generating baseline power and how big will the base line generation plant have to be in relation to the renewable plant?

I haven’t been able to arrive at any firm answers to either question as yet, but here are some thoughts. Most renewable advocates favor hydrogen fuel cells for providing base line power. Fuel cells have poor load following characteristics, are extremely expensive, and require DC to AC converters. The last introduce a whole host of problems, and probably the best course would be to use the DC output of the fuel cell to run a large DC motor which would turn an AC generator that would produce pure sine wave AC power. But a better solution would probably be to use hydrogen burning turbines which would emulate the characteristics of the current natural gas generators that produce a large fraction of the electrical power in the U.S. today.

The turbines would have to have a load following capability that would compensate for the fluctuations in output of the wind farms, so one would need data to determine that. An alternative might be to redesign the transmission grid entirely to deliver DC. High voltage DC transmission is already widely used in Russia and would be facilitated by the use of superconducting power cables which are available today, albeit at high price. If power transmission were DC, and AC were only produced locally, the problem of voltage fluctuation would only be visible at the inverter which could be designed to accommodate such fluctuations. In a pure AC system with no conversions voltage fluctuations are propagated through the entire grid as we have seen in regional power outages.

In any event, the cost of wind turbines alone for replacing fossil fuel powered turbines would be in the trillions. In think at least two million turbines would be needed and maybe more. One megawatt turbines go for over a million dollars a piece, and to replace the current 1000 gigawatt output of the existing fossil fuel and nuclear system would appear to cost about 1.6 trillion dollars. But turbines are generally rated at peak power output, not typical power output because that varies with wind speed. Normally, however, average power output is far below peak power, and so large, one megawatt, utility grade wind turbines need to be derated. And then there’s the matter of reserve capacity we talked about. First we’d have to determine just what percentage of total power reserve power should equal and then compute the reserve power requirement, taking into account the fact that we’d only be getting back about a quarter of the energy used in creating the reserve power due to losses in the electrolysis process and the subsequent use of hydrogen to generate electrical power.

If the grid is used to create hydrogen to run the transportation system, then the situation looks much worse. Transportation accounts for almost half the energy usage in the U.S. today, and the well to wheel efficiency of fuel cell powered vehicles is less than 20%. So what are we talking about, more than doubling the total renewable requirement after already increasing it by some multiple to provide reserve capacity?

And that’s leaving aside the cost of creating a new grid.

I believe that building a renewable based hydrogen economy might carry a price tag of over 20 trillion dollars for the United States alone. Such an undertaking would involve a commitment of a major portion of this nation’s total industrial capacity and investment capital. It’s just staggering.

In a purely technical sense it’s probably feasible, but in economic and political terms I just don’t see it happening. I think the U.S. is facing a very dicey energy situation in the first half of this century, a situation for which there are no obvious solutions. I don’t necessarily accept the Doomsday scenarios some have painted, other societies have adapted to shortages in the past, but dependence of the U.S. industrial economy on every increasing supplies of ever less expensive energy is troubling.

26 comments:

Herb said...

So many blogs and only 10 numbers to rate them. I'll have to give you a 9 because you have a quailty topic.

Free Access To More Information Aboutwww travel

Solarbird said...

Still, while things like oceanic hydrothermal is by nature highly localised, there could still be an awful lot of it produced to be converted into some sort of transportable form.

I tend to think that the problem isn't going to be total energy, but easily-transportable high-density energy. If, say, we're a gasoline/oil nation now, we'll hopefully be an electric nation in 30 years.

Katrina said...

Is the Feed for this blog live? I can't seem to get me aggregator to read it when I subscribe. It's possible that my sheet metal prototyping site is rendering the feed or service wrong within my own code. Not sure. I'll double check.

Katrina said...

I can't wait until I install my rss reader so I can subscribe to this blog. I'll have to finish building my rapid prototyping tooling site first so that I'll have a place to install the feed. Prototyping is my hobby.

Johnny said...

Hello, just visited your blog, it's informative. I have a website about **Plasma and LCD TV review**, please visit and hope that it's useful for you to choose your flat-panel TV.

Katbo said...

Is this blog feed live? I'd like to subscribe to it using my aggregator. It's possible that my site prototyping can get your feed automatically so I can keep up with our design and cnc posts here.

Katbo said...

Is this blog feed live? I'd like to subscribe to it using my aggregator. It's possible that my site prototyping can get your feed automatically so I can keep up with our design and cnc posts here.

Katrina said...

Do you have an Rss feed to subscribe to? Im learning how to install an Rss reader and I'm learning. But it seems that I've been juggling the learning of design prototyping and development in general. I'll get it working though.

Yvonne said...

Thanks

Daniel Sweeney

Yvonne said...

TO Solarbird,

Maybe we'll be electric in thirty years. I think increasing reliance on electricity is more likely than a hydrogen economy.

Daniel Sweeney

Greg said...

This site is great, nice job!!

I have a SEO info site. It is about seo partner articles and stuff.

Drop by when you can, nice site here!

Anonymous said...

Rhodiola Rosea is the latest natural remedy to join the arsenal of natural anxiety and stress (rhodiola rosea) reducers.

Rhodiola Rosea, also known as Golden Root, is a native plant of arctic Siberia. For centuries it has been used by eastern European and Asian cultures for physical endurance, work productivity, longevity, resistance to high altitude sickness, and to treat fatigue, depression, anemia, impotence, gastrointestinal ailments, infections, and nervous system disorders.

The first recorded medicinal applications of rodia riza (renamed Rhodiola Rosea) was made by the Greek physician, Dioscorides, in 77 C.E. in 'De Materia Medica'. Rhodiola Rosea has been included in official Russian medicine since 1969.

Despite its long history, the Western world has only recently become aware of the health benefits of Rhodiola Rosea. It has come to the attention of many natural health practitioners because of studies which tested its affects on combating anxiety and stress.

Rhodiola Rosea is considered an adaptogen. This means it has an overall stabilizing effect on the body without disrupting other functions. Its ability to normalize hormones may be effective for treating depression and anxiety.

Studies of Rhodiola Rosea show that it stimulates neurotransmitters and enhances their effects on the brain. This includes the ability for the brain to process serotonin which helps the body to adapt to stress.

Since adaptogens improve the body's overall ability to handle stress, it has been studied to identify it's effects on biological, chemical and physical stress.

A study was performed to test the effects of Rhodiola Rosea when stress or rhodiola rosea is caused by intense mental work (such as final exams). Such tests concluded that using Rhodiola Rosea improved the amount and quality of work, increasing mental clarity and reducing the effects of fatigue.

The effects of Rhodiola Rosea have also been tested on stress and anxiety from both physical and emotional sources. A report by the American Botanical Council states that "Most users find that it improves their mood, energy level, and mental clarity." They also report on a study that indicated Rhodiola Rosea could increase stress tolerance while at the same time protecting the brain and heart from the physical affects of stress.

This report included details of studies which highlight the overall health benefits of Rhodiola Rosea.

The generally recommended dose is 200-600mg/day. The active properties should be a minimum 0.8 percent salidroside and 3 percent rosavin.

It is important for consumers to know that Rhodiola may be sold using other species that do not share the properties of Rhodiola Rosea, rhodiola rosea, or at ineffective strengths for treatment. Anyone with depression or anxiety should also check with a health professional when treating these symptoms.

rhodiola rosea

Anonymous said...

To read more about 2006 toyota follow that link

Anonymous said...

San Diego is having a Hot Rod Halloween on Sunday, October 30. If you love atlanta car show then you will want to be there! All kinds of atlanta car show will be in attendance. For more information go to atlanta car show
See Ya There!!

Distance Detection System said...

Hi Yvonne, I came across your site while searching for some related information. Although not exactly what I was looking for, I really do like your site. You might also find information on the Backup Safety Device interesting too.. This is a safety device that every driver should not be without.

Anonymous said...

Nice post. Check out my site if you can. loan rate

Anonymous said...

Wish there was some filter for BLOG COMMENTS SPAM SCUM. Anyhow, I agree with your assessment that plug-in electric/ICE hybrids are the most likely near term automotive development (see www.calcars.org for their work on Toyota Prius). This 3x to 5X mileage boost will likely get us through the next 10-20 years. Beyond that, I'm hoping steadily improving battery technologies and electric utility improvements will keep us going. At this point, I see no plausible role for hydrogen, in either transportation, large scale utility, mobile electronics, or any other market.

Gordon said...

Your blog is informative. I have a website about flat panel tv review. So make sure you visit if you are interested in large screen tv.

Anonymous said...

nice blog enjoyed it :)

Keep up the excellent work! and i bookmarked u!

so cant wait for ur next post! :)

Thanks!!

Greg said...

This site is great, nice job!!

I have a SEO info site. It is about seo consulting articles and stuff.

Drop by when you can, nice site here!

Anonymous said...

Thanks for offering this great service to learn about academy sports and outdoors. I have a website about academy sports and outdoors which makes me very interested in what you have going here. I think I am going to start up my own blog so I can spread the news! Thanks you are offering this great service!

Plasma TElevision Center said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a Plasma Television site/blog. It pretty much covers Plasma Television related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

HTML-Magazin said...

I just came across your blog about blog things and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a web site about blog things so I know I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!

Anonymous said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a anxiety canine separation site/blog. It pretty much covers ##KEYWORD## related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

TadaDiscounts said...

You have an awesome site here! I have a website that may interest you- car audio with get content such as- car audio

Anonymous said...

Great post!

I did a search for ottawa gas prices and found this site. I have put together an ebook I have titled, "Huge Gas Pump Savings."

Dave
http://www.huge-gas-pump-savings.com/